How far we have a proper criteria and strictly follow the criteria. Can those anly two years involve in the university can determine and making judgement for promotion. If top management cannot make a fair judgement members of the faculty will never respect the the management. In Malaysian the fair judgment is not yet practice and hearsay still become a major ways of judgement.

CRITERIA FOR THE PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF

Consideration of all proposals for promotion should involve assessing the individual's overall contributions to UCL. These can best be judged under the following headings:

·           Research: contribution to the advancement of a subject by research and scholarship (defined as commitment to, and practice in, the acquisition and synthesis of knowledge and understanding);

·           Teaching: contribution to the advancement of a particular subject area through teaching and/or by educational innovation;

·           Knowledge transfer/exchange and engaging communities: contribution to quality of life or the economy through application of knowledge in practice to the benefit of the broader community (i.e. commerce, industry and the public domain); involvement in university projects to enhance engagement with the general public; and

·           Enabling: contribution to management or administration or other significant contribution to the achievement of university's wider goals and aims, which furthers the discipline, and/or facilitates and enhances the personal contributions of academic colleagues.