Friday, June 25, 2010
Report: Toxins found in whales bode ill for humans
This undated file photo provided by by Michael Moore of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts shows a sperm whale. Levels of cadmium, aluminum, chromium, lead, silver, mercury and titanium together are the highest ever found in marine mammals, scientists who spent five years shooting nearly 1,000 sperm whales with tissue-sampling darts say, warning that the health of both ocean life and the people who consume seafood could be at risk. (AP Photo/PA, Michael Moore, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
_____________________________________________________
Report: Toxins found in whales bode ill for humans
AGADIR, Morocco – Sperm whales feeding even in the most remote reaches of Earth's oceans have built up stunningly high levels of toxic and heavy metals. The findings spell danger not only for marine life but for the millions of humans who depend on seafood.
High levels of cadmium, aluminum, chromium, lead, silver, mercury and titanium in tissue samples taken by dart gun from nearly 1,000 whales over five years. From polar areas to equatorial waters, the whales ingested pollutants that may have been produced by humans thousands of miles away, the researchers said.
"These contaminants are threatening the human food supply. They certainly are threatening the whales and the other animals that live in the ocean,"
The researchers found mercury as high as 16 parts per million in the whales. Fish high in mercury such as shark and swordfish — the types health experts warn children and pregnant women to avoid — typically have levels of about 1 part per million.
The whales studied averaged 2.4 parts of mercury per million, but their internal organs probably had much higher levels than the skin samples contained.
"The entire ocean life is just loaded with a series of contaminants, most of which have been released by human beings,"
Sperm whales, which occupy the top of the food chain, absorb the contaminants and pass them on to the next generation when a female nurses her calf. "What she's actually doing is dumping her lifetime accumulation of that fat-soluble stuff into her baby," and each generation passes on more to the next.
The contaminants could jeopardize seafood, a primary source of animal protein for 1 billion people.
"When you're working with a synthetic chemical which never existed in nature before and you find it in a whale which came from the Arctic or Antarctic, it tells you that was made by people and it got into the whale” How that happened is unclear, but the contaminants likely were carried by wind or ocean currents, or were eaten by the sperm whales' prey.
Sperm whales are toothed whales that eat all kinds of fish, even sharks. Dozens have been taken by whaling ships in the past decade. Most of the whales hunted by the whaling countries of Japan, Norway and Iceland are minke whales, which are baleen whales that feed largely on tiny krill.
Chromium, an industrial pollutant that causes cancer in humans, was found in all but two of the 361 sperm whale samples that were tested for it. Those findings were published last year in the scientific journal Chemosphere.
The corrosion-resistant metal is used in stainless steel, paints, dyes and the tanning of leather. It can cause lung cancer in people who work in industries where it is commonly used.
It was impossible to say from the samples whether any of the whales suffered diseases, but Wise found that the concentration of chromium found in whales was several times higher than the level required to kill healthy cells in a Petri dish.
He said another surprise was the high concentrations of aluminum, which is used in packaging, cooking pots and water treatment. Its effects are unknown.
"No other future for whale species except extinction "This is not on anybody's radar, no government's radar anywhere”
_________________________________________________
We said we want to be infront in science, we protect our environment and biodiversity and we care of our environmental health and human health. How much money we put in for R&D in ecotoxicology? Refer to the expert to get right answer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Not referring to experts but rather refer to the panels for R & D approval....isn't it?
how many of our panels are experts?. I hv one case. Two symposium (2007 & 2009) concluded by the experts from USA, Japan, New Zealands, Hong Kong, Thailand, China, Korea, and Malaysia (may be we exclude Malaysia because the panels are better), ecology, diversity and genetic variation of java medaka need to be studied urgently. BUT the panels expert in Malaysia rejected the proposal. Do not worry Malaysia is still in front, 5 stars and leading in developing countries and in some aspects better than dveloped countries. SYOK SENDIRI
Post a Comment